JED
  • Home

  • |
  • Announcement

  • |
  • Event

  • |
  • Contact Us

  • Editorial Board

    • Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Team
  • Policies & Guidelines

    • Journal Information
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Publication Ethics
  • Online Submission

    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Editors
  • Archives

    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Search for Articles
  • Indexing & Abstracting

    • Scopus
    • Web of Science ESCI
    • Asean Citation Index
    • Google Scholar
    • V-CitationGate
    • Crossref
    • DOAJ
    • Cabell's Directories
    • EBSCO Discovery Service
    • ROAD
    • Summons (ProQuest)
    • WorldCat
    • ProQuest Central
    • EconLit

The current issue

Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Search for Articles
Home / Archives / All Issues / Volume 14, Number 1, April 2012
Volume 14, Number 1, April 2012 << Back
JED, Vol 14, No.1, April 2012, pp. 5-30 | DOI: 10.33301/2012.14.01.01

Disclosure Quality of Goodwill Impairment Testing: A Disclosure Index

Khairil Faizal Khairi; Nur Hidayah Laili; Dung Manh Tran

Abstract:This study sets out to offer proof of several important questions relating to the quality of information disclosed on goodwill impairment process under the new requirements of FRS 36. This study investigates the compliance level and disclosure quality of FRS 36 by top 20 of Singaporean listed firms in SGX at 2007 based on their market capitalization. In order to achieve the objective of this study, the weight- ed index is chosen because this index is able to differentiate the quality and impor- tance of each mandatory disclosure under FRS 36. The weighted index was developed by constructing a disclosure scoring sheet, obtaining annual reports of 20 sampled Singapore firms for particular year, complet- ing scoring sheet for each firms by assigned weighted for the disclosure items and calculating disclosure weighted index. The weighted index was analyzed to examine the firm’s compliance with the FRS 36 disclosure requirements. The results of this study revealed that 18 out of 20 (90%) firms in Singapore failed to comply with the most basic elements of the FRS 36 pertaining to goodwill impairment testing espe- cially in allocating goodwill into the CGUs and key assumptions used in determin- ing the recoverable amount of CGU assets.

Keywords:Impairment testing, FRS 36, Weighted Index, Singapore.
Download full text:  

Other articles

  • Issues in the Balanced Scorecard Implementation: A Vietnamese Case Study

    Mai Xuan Thuy

     
  • Determinants of Firm Growth in the Vietnamese Commercial-Service Sector

    Nguyen Thi Nguyet

     
  • The Knowledge Creation Organization: The Case of Alphanam

    Nguyen Ngoc Thang

     
  • Entry Mode of MNEs in Vietnam: An Eclectic Model of The Choice Between International Joint Ventures and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries

    Vu Manh Chien; Phan Thanh Tu

     
#1406 Building A1, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong, Hanoi
Tel: +84 (0) 24. 36280280 - Ext: 6407 | Email: submission@ktpt.edu.vn
Publishing License: 159/GP-BTTTT dated 08 May 2023
Copyright © Journal of Economics & Development. All rights reserved