JED
  • Home

  • |
  • Announcement

  • |
  • Event

  • |
  • Contact Us

  • Editorial Board

    • Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Team
  • Policies & Guidelines

    • Journal Information
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Publication Ethics
  • Online Submission

    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Editors
  • Archives

    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Search for Articles
  • Indexing & Abstracting

    • Scopus
    • Web of Science ESCI
    • Asean Citation Index
    • Google Scholar
    • V-CitationGate
    • Crossref
    • DOAJ
    • Cabell's Directories
    • EBSCO Discovery Service
    • ROAD
    • Summons (ProQuest)
    • WorldCat
    • ProQuest Central
    • EconLit

The current issue

Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Search for Articles
Home / Archives / All Issues / Volume 17, Number 3, December 2015
Volume 17, Number 3, December 2015 << Back
JED, Vol. 17, No.3, December 2015, pp. 25-41 | DOI: 10.33301/2015.17.03.02

Trade Creation or Trade Diversion in ASEAN and ASEAN+6 FTAs: Trade Indicators Approach

Tu Thuy Anh; Le Minh Ngoc

Abstract:This paper makes use of two trade indicators, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) and Regional Orientation (RO), to evaluate the economic impacts of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (The) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on Vietnamese commodities at the Harmonized System (HS) 2-digit level. Several sectors in which Vietnam has revealed a comparative advantage, has benefited from the AFTA, and would continue to enjoy trade creation from the RCEP, are: Cereals (10), Salt, sulphur, earth, stone, plaster, lime and cement (25), Rubber (40), Knitted or crocheted fabric (60), etc. More importantly, the result provides a list of commodities in which Vietnam has a comparative advantage and only experiences trade creation when participating in the RCEP. These are: Milling products, malt, starches, inulin, wheat gluten (11), Vegetable plaiting materials, vegetable products not elsewhere specified (14), Wood and articles of wood, wood charcoal (44), etc. Findings also show commodities in which Vietnam has a comparative advantage; but are not well positioned in the RCEP market yet, e.g. Cereal, flour, starch, milk preparations and products (19) and Manmade staple fibres (55). If sufficient investment decisions and marketing strategies are applied to these commodities, they will well penetrate the RCEP market and bring trade creation and welfare improvement to Vietnam. Public and private investment should consider the above-mentioned commodities as targets to leapfrog the benefits of RCEP.

Keywords:Regional trade agreement; ASEAN; RCEP; impact assessment; trade indicators.
Download full text:  

Other articles

  • Corruption and Remittances: Evidence from Around the World

    Muhammad Tariq Majeed

     
  • Economic Growth and Macro Variables in India: An Empirical Study

    Saba Ismail; Shahid Ahmed

     
  • Social Capital in Rural Areas of Vietnam and Its Impact on Households’ Life Satisfaction

    Nguyen Thi Tuong Anh; Tran Quynh Anh

     
  • The Determinants of Merger Withdrawals’ Abnormal Returns in The Australian Market

    Nguyen Thu Thuy; Dao Thi Thu Giang; Truong Huy Hoang

     
#1406 Building A1, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong, Hanoi
Tel: +84 (0) 24. 36280280 - Ext: 6407 | Email: submission@ktpt.edu.vn
Publishing License: 159/GP-BTTTT dated 08 May 2023
Copyright © Journal of Economics & Development. All rights reserved