JED
  • Home

  • |
  • Announcement

  • |
  • Event

  • |
  • Contact Us

  • Editorial Board

    • Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Team
  • Policies & Guidelines

    • Journal Information
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Publication Ethics
  • Online Submission

    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Editors
  • Archives

    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Search for Articles
  • Indexing & Abstracting

    • Scopus
    • Web of Science ESCI
    • Asean Citation Index
    • Google Scholar
    • V-CitationGate
    • Crossref
    • DOAJ
    • Cabell's Directories
    • EBSCO Discovery Service
    • ROAD
    • Summons (ProQuest)
    • WorldCat
    • ProQuest Central
    • EconLit

The current issue

Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Search for Articles
Home / Archives / All Issues / Volume 22, Number 1, 2020
Volume 22, Number 1, 2020 << Back
Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 149-166 | DOI: 10.1108/JED-11-2019-0066

Confucianism, growth and democracy

Tay-Cheng Ma; Lishu Ouyang

Abstract:Purpose
The purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of Confucianism on growth under different political regimes.

Design/methodology/approach
The empirical specification adopts a two-regime panel threshold model proposed by Hansen (1999) to endogenously divide our country sample into two-regime-types – autocracy and democracy – according to a country's democratic stock or experiences.

Findings
The results show that the effect of Confucianism on growth exhibits an asymmetrical pattern depending on the status of a country's political democracy. Only when a moderate level of freedom has already been attained can Confucianism have a positive effect on growth. Conversely, for autocracies whose democratic institutions cannot pass a certain threshold, Confucianism has a very limited effect in terms of changing economic activity.

Research limitations/implications
If the data with different sample years and/or different sample countries are used, the research results may lack generalizability. Further tests of the two-regime model with different data sizes are encouraged.

Originality/value
The authors use the World Values Survey (WVS) map to identify the countries under the influence of Confucianism. The authors emphasize that focusing only on political geography may overlook the information from the spread of cultural traits that accompanied the migration of people. So, based on the Confucian countries suggested by the WVS and the migration matrix of Putterman and Weil (2010), an immigration-based Confucianism variable was constructed. To accommodate different effects of Confucianism on growth in different phases of political development, the empirical specification adopts an asymmetrical pattern to investigate the impact of Confucianism on economic performance.

Keywords:Confucianism, Growth, Democracy, Two-regime panel threshold model
Download full text:  

Other articles

  • Spillover effects of the US monetary policy normalization on African stock markets

    Ebere Kalu; Chinwe Okoyeuzu; Angela Ukemenam; Augustine Ujunwa

     
  • Sustainability of the rice-shrimp farming system in Mekong Delta, Vietnam: a climate adaptive model

    Huy Duc Dang

     
  • Impact of credit rationing on capital allocated to inputs used by rice farmers in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam

    Cao Van Hon; Le Khuong Ninh

     
  • The effects of financial inclusion on agricultural productivity in Nigeria

    Babajide Fowowe

     
#1406 Building A1, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong, Hanoi
Tel: +84 (0) 24. 36280280 - Ext: 6407 | Email: submission@ktpt.edu.vn
Publishing License: 159/GP-BTTTT dated 08 May 2023
Copyright © Journal of Economics & Development. All rights reserved