JED
  • Home

  • |
  • Announcement

  • |
  • Event

  • |
  • Contact Us

  • Editorial Board

    • Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Team
  • Policies & Guidelines

    • Journal Information
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Publication Ethics
  • Online Submission

    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Editors
  • Archives

    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Search for Articles
  • Indexing & Abstracting

    • Scopus
    • Web of Science ESCI
    • Asean Citation Index
    • Google Scholar
    • V-CitationGate
    • Crossref
    • DOAJ
    • Cabell's Directories
    • EBSCO Discovery Service
    • ROAD
    • Summons (ProQuest)
    • WorldCat
    • ProQuest Central
    • EconLit

The current issue

Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Search for Articles
Home / Archives / All Issues / Volume 22, Number 2, 2020
Volume 22, Number 2, 2020 << Back
Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 187-207 | DOI 10.1108/JED-01-2020-0001

Threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa: a new evidence

Arcade Ndoricimpa

Abstract:
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to seek to re-examine the threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa.

Design/methodology/approach
This study applies panel smooth transition regression approach advanced by González et al. (2017). The method allows for both heterogeneity as well as a smooth change of regression coefficients from one regime to another.

Findings
A debt threshold in the range of 62–66% is estimated for the whole sample. Low debt is found to be growth neutral but higher public debt is growth detrimental. For middle-income and resource-intensive countries, a debt threshold in the range of 58–63% is estimated. As part of robustness checks, a dynamic panel threshold model was also applied to deal with the endogeneity of debt, and a much higher debt threshold was estimated, at 74.3%. While low public debt is found to be either growth neutral or growth enhancing, high public debt is consistently detrimental to growth.

Research limitations/implications
The findings of this study show that there is no single debt threshold applicable to all African countries, and confirm that the debt threshold level is sensitive to modeling choices. While further analysis is still needed to suggest a policy, the findings of this study show that high debt is detrimental to growth.

Originality/value
The novelty of this study is twofold. Contrary to previous studies on Africa, this study applies a different estimation technique which allows for heterogeneity and a smooth change of regression coefficients from one regime to another. Another novelty distinct from the previous studies is that, for robustness checks, this study divides the sample into low- and middle-income countries, and into resource- and nonresource intensive countries, as debt experience can differ among country groups. Further, as part of robustness checks, another estimation method is also applied in which the threshold variable (debt) is allowed to be endogenous.

Keywords:Africa, Economic growth, Public debt, Debt threshold, Panel smooth transition regression
Download full text:  

Other articles

  • The cost efficiency of Vietnamese banks – the difference between DEA and SFA

    Phong Hoang Nguyen; Duyen Thi Bich Pham

     
  • Financial integration and macroeconomic volatility in Zimbabwe

    Richard Makoto

     
  • Interdependence between banking earnings, banking security and growth achievement: case study in the ASEAN community

    Minh Phu Pham

     
  • Corruption and SME financing structure: the case of Vietnamese manufacturing

    Mai Hong Phan; Lan Archer

     
#1406 Building A1, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong, Hanoi
Tel: +84 (0) 24. 36280280 - Ext: 6407 | Email: submission@ktpt.edu.vn
Publishing License: 159/GP-BTTTT dated 08 May 2023
Copyright © Journal of Economics & Development. All rights reserved