JED
  • Home

  • |
  • Announcement

  • |
  • Event

  • |
  • Contact Us

  • Editorial Board

    • Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Team
  • Policies & Guidelines

    • Journal Information
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Publication Ethics
  • Online Submission

    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Editors
  • Archives

    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Search for Articles
  • Indexing & Abstracting

    • Scopus
    • Web of Science ESCI
    • Asean Citation Index
    • Google Scholar
    • V-CitationGate
    • Crossref
    • DOAJ
    • Cabell's Directories
    • EBSCO Discovery Service
    • ROAD
    • Summons (ProQuest)
    • WorldCat
    • ProQuest Central
    • EconLit

The current issue

Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Search for Articles
Home / Archives / All Issues / Volume 25, Number 2, 2023
Volume 25, Number 2, 2023 << Back
Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2022-0214

Shadow economy and FDI: the role of corruption and land resource

Rukaiyat Adebusola Yusuf; Loan Thi Quynh Nguyen

Abstract:
Purpose
This research examines how shadow economy affects foreign direct investment (FDI).

Design/methodology/approach
The study utilizes a panel dataset including 124 nations between 1997 and 2015. Information on shadow economy, FDI and macro-economic characteristics is obtained from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and World Bank database. Various econometric methods are employed, such as the panel ordinary least squares (OLS) with fixed-effect estimator and the two-step system generalized method of moments estimation.

Findings
The findings of the study illustrate that shadow economy negatively influences total FDI inflows, and this adverse impact is mainly driven by greenfield investments – a component of FDI. Moreover, the authors provide evidence that the shadow economy has more devastating influences on FDI inflows in countries with higher corruption levels and fewer land resources.

Practical implications
Overall, this research suggests an important policy implication that the shadow economy should be controlled more strictly since it harms the FDI inflows, especially greenfield investment.

Originality/value
This research is among the first attempt of evaluating the effect of shadow economy on different FDI types. Furthermore, it examines how the shadow economy–FDI inflows nexus is changed when considering factors including corruption and land resource.

Keywords:Shadow economy, FDI, Greenfield investment, Cross-border M&As, Corruption
Download full text:  

Other articles

  • Land rental markets as a poverty reduction strategy: evidence from Southeast Asia

    Eva Seewald; Samantha Baerthel; Trung Thanh Nguyen

     
  • The effect of digital financial inclusion on the green economy: the case of Egypt

    Doaa Salman; Doaa Ismael

     
  • Inflation uncertainty, macroeconomic instability and the efficiency of financial institutions

    Rexford Abaidoo; Elvis Kwame Agyapong

     
  • Reported shocks, households' resilience and local food commercialization in Thailand

    Menglan Wang; Manh Hung Do

     
#1406 Building A1, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong, Hanoi
Tel: +84 (0) 24. 36280280 - Ext: 6407 | Email: submission@ktpt.edu.vn
Publishing License: 159/GP-BTTTT dated 08 May 2023
Copyright © Journal of Economics & Development. All rights reserved