JED
  • Home

  • |
  • Announcement

  • |
  • Event

  • |
  • Contact Us

  • Editorial Board

    • Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Team
  • Policies & Guidelines

    • Journal Information
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Publication Ethics
  • Online Submission

    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Editors
  • Archives

    • Current Issue
    • All Issues
    • Search for Articles
  • Indexing & Abstracting

    • Scopus
    • Web of Science ESCI
    • Asean Citation Index
    • Google Scholar
    • V-CitationGate
    • Crossref
    • DOAJ
    • Cabell's Directories
    • EBSCO Discovery Service
    • ROAD
    • Summons (ProQuest)
    • WorldCat
    • ProQuest Central
    • EconLit

The current issue

Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Volume 27, Number 1, 2025
Search for Articles
Home / Archives / All Issues / Volume 25, Number 4, 2023
Volume 25, Number 4, 2023 << Back
Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-07-2022-0119

Basic income in Australia: an exploration

Son Nghiem, Xuan-Binh (Benjamin) Vu

Abstract:
Purpose
Basic income (BI) is predicted to be the major economic intervention in response to raising income inequality and accelerating technological progress. Financing is often the first question that arises when discussing a BI. A thorough answer to this question will determine the sustainability of any BI program. However, BI experiments implemented worldwide have not answered this question. This paper explores two options for a BI program in Australia: (1) BI and (2) top-up basic income (TBI).

Design/methodology/approach
The authors employ “back-of-the-envelope” calculations with the latest publicly available data on income distribution, the poverty line and the share of income tax in the government revenue to estimate the costs of implementing BI in Australia.

Findings
Even without any change in the current tax regulations, the TBI option, which requires a contribution of 2–3% disposable income from net contributors, will guarantee that no Australian family lives under the current national poverty line. The BI for all options is not financially feasible under the current tax and transfer regulations because it requires an additional tax rate of at least 42% of disposable income from net contributors.

Practical implications
The results of this study can serve as inputs for the design and implementation of BI options in Australia and similar countries. Originality/value This is the first paper that examines the macroeconomic effects of BI options in Australia.

Keywords:Basic income, Effective marginal tax rate, Clawback, Macroeconomic effects
Download full text:  

Other articles

  • On the welfare effect of retail electricity subsidy in Vietnam

    Lam Do; Thai-Ha Le

     
  • Does a farmer's knowledge of minimum support price (MSP) affect the farm-gate price? Evidence from India

    Aditya Korekallu Srinivasa; K.V. Praveen; Subash Surendran Padmaja; M.L. Nithyashree; Girish K. Jha

     
  • Is internal migration a way to cope with weather extremes? Evidence from Egypt

    Mohamed Arouri, Adel Ben-Youssef, Cuong Viet Nguyen

     
  • Institutional quality and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel data approach

    Mohammed Seid Hussen

     
#1406 Building A1, National Economics University, 207 Giai Phong, Hanoi
Tel: +84 (0) 24. 36280280 - Ext: 6407 | Email: submission@ktpt.edu.vn
Publishing License: 159/GP-BTTTT dated 08 May 2023
Copyright © Journal of Economics & Development. All rights reserved